Category Archives: Industry Statistics

News Corp Reports Revenue Decline

News Corp, the publisher of newspapers including The Times and The Sun, has reported a 2.8% decline in revenues for the quarter ending 30th September 2013 with a decline in advertising being blamed for the decrease.

In the first quarter since News Corp was split into a highly successful entertainment company and a less profitable publishing business earlier this year, the latter’s net income rose from a loss of $83 million last year to a profit of $38 million. However, year-on-year annual sales actually fell from $2.13 billion to $2.07 billion, falling short of the $2.18 billion total predicted by analysts, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.


The news division, whose portfolio includes titles in the US, the UK and Australia, saw advertising fall 12 percent and revenues from circulation and subscription decrease by 6 percent with the Australian papers accounting for the largest decline (a 22% drop in sales).

In response to the results, Robert Thompson, News Corp’s chief executive, was keen to highlight that the company is in a period of transition with the brands’ evolution into digital content providers key to its future: “Our first quarter as the new News was the beginning of a journey in the digital development of the company. We […] are transforming our publishing operations longer-term into multi-platform businesses [and] we are even more convinced the company will thrive as the company becomes more digital.”

Paid websites represent a key part of this strategy – it is now three years since The Times and Sunday Times websites went behind a paywall with The Sun following suit earlier this year. While it has been a controversial approach at odds with that of the highly successful Guardian and Daily Mail sites, News UK argue that the indisputable reduction in visitors is compensated for by the quality of the data they have on their subscribers and, therefore, the level of targeting which they can offer advertisers. However, from Four’s point-of-view, this reduced traffic makes it difficult to reach a sufficient number of people on more niche areas of the site relevant to our clients, such as the Property section.

In addition, News UK has identified the iPad and tablet apps as central to a strong digital offering, with increased functionality and a wider range of creative advertising solutions being planned for 2014. With Tesco’s £119 Hudl tablet tipped to be a strong seller this Christmas, we believe that a presence on apps will become increasingly important to many of our clients in the coming months.

Can Twitter Work as an Ad Medium?

On its first day as a public company Twitter was valued at £19bn. Following its successful stock market launch, Twitter now needs to prove to investors that it can effectively grow its revenue; one medium through which it would do this is advertising.


There are 230 million users globally on Twitter, 76% of which access Twitter on a mobile device. Therefore advertisers are extremely interested in utilising mobile ads. In response to this, Twitter is introducing a new set of targeting capabilities for mobile devices.  Now all advertisers can segment audiences on iOS and Android by operating system version, specific device, and WiFi connectivity. This helps advertisers reach the users most important to them, for example mobile app developers can target users with the necessary operating systems, prompting a new download or re-engagement through an app card. This is something that has previously been successfully operated by Facebook, the main rival of Twitter.

Telco companies can now also promote loyalty and rewards to users on their specific devices. All marketers can focus campaigns on users with device models that are indicative of demographics which align to their campaign goals.

Furthermore there is now the self-serve ad platform to be used by small businesses across the UK. Anyone with a Twitter account and a credit card can now buy promoted tweets and promote accounts; targeted through keywords or interests and followers.

In addition to this, the new segmentation reporting gives advertisers better insights in to the OS versions and specific devices of users engaging with their general campaigns.


So will Twitter be an effective advertising platform? Despite the many advantages of using advertising on social media, the juxtaposed dangers were suitably demonstrated last month on Facebook, when a video showing a human decapitation appeared without warning. This was a disaster for advertisers sharing this content on the same page. Clearly, regulation of content is a difficult and controversial issue to tackle. Twitter has its own pitfalls for companies, for example companies are being warned about Twitter ‘trolls’; who can harm the company’s reputation with unprovoked criticism.

Now that images are allowed, ads appearing in Twitter are much more prominent. This does change the experience for the user. As Twitter pushes for more advertising there is the potential for a backlash from users as they are inundated with adverts. Plans were revealed to widen its advertising to target “every business on the planet”. Although this is brilliant news for small/medium businesses, this may not sit well with some users. Therefore a fine balance needs to be reached to avoid the over-saturation of adverts, on Twitter feeds, driving its users away.

Tackling Tablet Advertising [Guest Blog]


Giles Milner, PR and Marketing Manager at estate agents Chesterton Humberts, offers some learnings from a project to bring the benefits of tablet advertising to the process of selling houses.

I think it is fair to say that the UK property industry, estate agencies included, cannot be considered ‘early adopters’ when it comes to new technology and are very rarely seen at the forefront of cutting-edge marketing.

I have always found this slightly odd, given that the industry has one of the most widely talked about, highly coveted, well publicised, emotive and expensive products on the market: homes. With the majority of the adult population owning one or having aspirations to own a property, the opportunity for online engagement new media in the industry is huge and yet surprisingly untapped.

As print readership continues to decline whilst tablet penetration rockets, with an estimated 30% of the UK population now using one, there is an opportunity to engage with the lost print readership that has migrated to digital versions via tablet versions of those print publications.

Despite the almost unbelievable growth of tablets since the launch of the iPad in 2010, when I took over the marketing team at Chesterton Humberts in 2012 I was struck by how slow both traditional media owners and our competitors seem to have been at embracing the level of interactivity that this platform can offer.

Currently, many media owners’ own technological limitations allow only very limited scope for innovation and interactive elements on their tablet editions and most of our competitors use a relatively flat advert or seem satisfied with ticking the ‘interactive’ box with a basic picture gallery.

Although it was clear that Chesterton Humberts needed to be advertising on this platform, I was reluctant to enter the tablet advertising arena with a ‘standard’ advert and was determined to create something more innovative, more engaging and more fun for readers – demonstrating the extent to which we embrace new technology for the benefit of our clients and setting the bar for other advertisers.

From experience, we know that the majority of people that read the property pages are more interested in the human-interest side of property and looking at pictures of beautiful homes than they are in market comment and traditional corporate advertising. With this knowledge, we decided to create a ‘native’ advert that would fit almost seamlessly within the media content and give readers what they would expect from the editorial element of the publication – the opportunity to explore someone else’s beautiful home, hear directly from the people selling the home (as opposed to the estate agent), learn the history of the property and enjoy some editorial-style, ‘not-on-the-brochure’ bits of information.

With the help of our media buyers, Four Communications, and the digital team at Adnostic, as long as you are on an iPad or using the CHROME browser, you can see the fruit of our efforts here.

Although of course slightly biased, Adnostic consider this one of the best ads they have ever done with Matt White, Creative Director, praising the way “it demonstrates tablet advertising’s capacity for advanced HTML animation and interaction and presents multi-pane content in an intuitive and premium manner”.

The feedback from our clients and the engagement statistics from the advert have so far been very positive, easily out-performing the average ‘flat’ advert, and this has encouraged us to start working on our next advert. Perhaps even more flattering is the fantastic feedback that we have had from the publications themselves, who seem just as excited as us to see this sort of innovation coming through.

For example, Lee Fels, Head of Mobile at The Guardian, notes that the campaign has twice as long an average dwell time as any other interstitial run in November. He went on to praise the way that the app seamlessly included multiple calls to action, noting that “it is easy to include a lot of CTAs into an iPad app, but the skill is to do so without cluttering the beauty of a full page advert delivered on tablet”.

I would love to say that we got everything right first time, but if I did, I would be lying. In reality, there are a few things that we did that we won’t do next time, but these all form a valuable lesson, the learnings from which we will incorporate into our next effort, along with some features and ideas that we didn’t manage to include the first time around so watch this space!

The Growth of Multi-Screening


Multi-touch point media campaigns are not a new thing.  Outdoor, print, TV and cinema have long operated hand in hand to enable brands to reach an audience through-out the day, with people interacting with different platforms at different points of the day.  This has changed over the years however, with the introduction of a variety of differing media.  Google announced, in a piece of research in 2012 that 80% of people in the UK’s interaction with media now come through a screen, be it TV, tablets or smartphones for example.

The portable nature of laptops and especially tablets and smartphones has encouraged a dramatic growth in ‘multi-screening’, where an individual interacts with multiple screened devices at the same time (Marketing Week, 2012).  Advertisers too are catching up with this trend with ad campaigns that run simultaneously on multiple screens, designed to drive response by emphasising the brand’s message to a consumers on all of the devices they may be using at one time

The British market has seen an increase in the number of advertising brands seeing benefit in multi-screen campaigns.  Some opt for ad campaigns on TV, along with online and tablet display advertising spots.  However, the most noticeable of interactive multi-screen campaigns have come with the inclusion by advertisers, of links to Twitter feeds on their TV advertising (Hawlins, 2013).  This is done in an attempt to drive social media interaction with a brand which ‘helps organise and steer the conversation’ (Twitter, 2013) on that brand.

Thinkbox reported in 2012 that 72% of TV viewers stay in the room for TV advertising when not multi-screening; while 81% do when multi-screening, meaning that not only are the multi-screening audience more likely to see advertising, the ability to reach them on multiple platforms will increase the impact.

The opportunities to take advantage of the multi-screening audience are also increasing with improvements in targeting technologies.  The technological facility to target specific households by their social demographic grouping and deliver messages to individual screens within that household now exists.  This technology considers all of the devices/screens in a household as part of the same ‘ecosystem’ and delivers ads across each platform accordingly.  19 million households across the UK are currently accessible in this manner. There is significant power to be gained from targeting both the breadwinner and decision makers in a household across multiple platforms simultaneously and for further details on how to take advantage of such technology please contact Four Marketing & Media.

Research of the US media market, undertaken by the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) and Nielsen shows that 20% of media budgets are now ear-marked for multi-screen campaigns.  (WARC,2013).  This trend will also continue to grow, with the sale of tablets predicted to continue to grow dramatically (Lomas, 2013) and the expansion of 4G networks and ever faster broadband connections ensuring smoother online access, delivering an easier route to interaction.  Advertising that takes advantage of the multi-screening phenomenon will therefore increase, given the repetition and strength of message a campaign of this ilk affords an advertiser and the ability it gives these advertisers to wrestle back the share of voice, lost by the divergence of advertisers across multiple screens.

Digital Ad Spend at an All-Time High

According to the latest IAB Digital Adspend report, advertisers have spent a record six-month high of £3.04 billion online. British consumers spend a staggering one in every 12 minutes online, equating to 43 hours a month!

Fuelled by smartphone ownership reaching 68% of the population in June 2013, mobile advertising now accounts for 14% of all digital ad spend, which grew like-for-like by 127% to £429.2 million in the first half of the year, almost double that for the same period in 2012.

Total mobile display advertising, which includes video, increased like-for-like by 195% to £105.5 million in the first half of 2013 and for the first time, consumer goods has doubled its share in a year to 26.8%.

Another online first, the consumer goods sector overtook entertainment and media, as the biggest spender as a mobile display advertiser, and finance as the biggest spender on the digital display advertising platform.

Research also shows that the tablet ad spend for the first half of 2013 was around the £10.5 million mark, up from approximately £2.4 million for the first half of 2012. This increase in ad spend could be a result of the increase in tablet users – almost one in three consumers in the UK will be using a tablet this year, according to research from eMarketer.

By 2017, the eMarketer estimates that more than half of the UK population will use a tablet device regularly.

One explanation for such a radical increase is the increasing availability of low-end tablet alternatives. Last month, Tesco announced the launch of its own brand tablet, called Hudl, which will retail at £119, a mere quarter of the cost of Apple’s iPad!

Another reason for such an increase could be that as audiences are more accustomed with going online via mobile devices, they are becoming more ‘adjusted’ to using tablets, with the majority of tablet owners still in the 25-54 age range.

UK Tablet Users


Commercial Radio’s Mid-Life Crisis?



Commercial radio recently celebrated its 40th birthday – time for a mid-life crisis?

Launched on Monday 8th October 1973, the first legally authorised commercial radio station was LBC, the London Broadcasting Company. After a slow start, commercial radio swiftly picked up with the launch of a number of local radio stations and eventually, national stations, providing new and exciting opportunities for advertisers to reach their consumers.

Over the last decade, there has been a lot of speculation over the future of radio, and whether it can survive amongst the iPods and Spotifys of the 21st Century. The latest Rajar data shows that while weekly reach doesn’t seem to be suffering, users are listening for fewer hours on average per week across almost all commercial stations. This is obviously not great news for the advertiser, as listeners are now exposed to fewer adverts.

But right on cue, radio appears to be going through a mid-life crisis of sorts, with a number of new music streaming services popping up to join the ranks of Spotify and Napster.

Apple Ads


One of the most hotly anticipated is Apple’s new iTunes Radio, which is set to launch in the UK in early 2014, offering a whole new radio experience to listeners. With more than 200 stations to choose from, listeners will be able to skip tracks, purchase songs and even customise stations around their favourite artists, songs and genres.
iTunes Radio is likely to prove attractive not only to consumers, but also to advertisers, allowing creativity and interactivity in ad formats and, most crucially, providing exceptional targeting tools. With registration and media consumption data, advertisers can use insights about listeners’ lifestyle and purchase habits to target with a precision previously unavailable to radio advertising.

Another way iTunes radio is setting itself apart from traditional radio is the frequency of ad breaks. With audio adverts only once every 15 minutes and a video spot every hour, this is fairly minimal compared to other stations; rival streaming services currently play around 8-12 ads per hour, whilst on traditional stations this number rises to 25.

It is currently unknown how much one of these coveted ad spots will cost, but for its recent US launch, the minimum buy-in was reputedly $1m worth of spots, with Apple forming partnerships with McDonald’s, Nissan, Procter & Gamble and Pepsi, giving them exclusivity within their respective industries until the end of 2013.

With the UK launch set for early 2014, brands don’t have long to wait before they can get onto the iTunes airwaves.

It remains to be seen whether iTunes Radio and other music streaming services are set to revolutionise radio advertising, but with year-on-year figures for online and mobile radio listening up 31% and 34% respectively, our radio consumption is clearly moving with the times. As advertising everywhere becomes increasingly digital, it would be a mistake to ignore the new possibilities offered by radio today.

Apple Ads


The ‘Rising Stars’ of digital media?

At Four we are always looking for ways to increase the effectiveness of our campaigns.

Visually creative new ideas that encourage audience interactions are being dubbed the ‘the canvasses of the future’ for brand advertising on digital platforms. Needless to say, it is a great way to run a branding campaign that drives user engagement.

As you can see from the chart below, the statistics demonstrate that the click-through rate (CTR) for these rich media banners tends to be significantly higher than standard banners:

Rich Media Banners


Some examples of these banners and how they work:

  • Dynamic skins that offer a stimulating background to a webpage.
  • Product carousels that allow the user to scroll through an ad and navigating further accordingly.
  • 3D MPUs literally jump out of the page at you, a sure way to catch the eye of the audience.
  • Gliders that present a floating ad in front of the original article, which can be navigated accordingly by the user.
  • Shutters that play a video advert when a user clicks or hovers over the ad that contain product images and further calls to action, such as ‘view further images’, ‘register now’, ‘click to purchase’ or ‘view more information

Not only do users tend to spend more time engaging with these ad formats, research also shows that users liked the ads more, saying that they improved their impression of the website more than standard banners.

The great advantage of using these ads is that they are deliberately interactive; they are designed to make it as easy as possible to instantly engage with a brand or product. This gives the audience the freedom to interact and explore the advert within a pop-up microsite, without being pulled away from their original article.

Below is an annotated example of an ‘open door’ format created by Adform:

Open Door Ad format


National newspaper round-up: June 2013

The latest national newspaper circulation figures published by ABC this week show that the Daily, Free and Sunday markets were all down compared to this time last year.

Daily Titles

When looking at the quality market, the Financial Times saw the biggest period on period (PoP) increase between May and June 2013 at just 0.7%. This equates to a circulation increase of 1,833 copies. However, the Financial Times did post a year on year (YoY) decrease in circulation of 13% which equates to 38,737 copies. One must take in to account that the FT has recently culled many of its bulk copies.

The Daily Telegraph posted a PoP increase of 0.3% (1,527 copies) between May and June with a YoY loss of 4.6%.

Despite YoY losses across the quality market, the “I” posted a circulation increase of 11.2% which equates to a total of 30,412 copies. However, it did post a PoP loss of 1.2% between May and June.

The mid-market titles did not fare any better, the Daily Express saw a loss of 0.6% from May and a 13.3% YoY loss. Despite the huge popularity of the Daily Mail’s online offering, its print circulation saw a YoY drop of 133,000.

Overall, the dailies were down 0.2% PoP and 0.9% YoY overall.

London Free Press

City A.M. was the only title in this market to see any period growth, at just 0.1%. The Metro (London) posted the greatest loss of all three title in June, its circulation fell by 3,188 copies.

The London Evening Standard posted a YoY loss of 0.1% which equates to just 555 copies.

Overall, the Free titles were down 0.3% PoP and 0.6% YoY overall.

Sunday Titles

The Sunday market did not see any YoY growth across June, however, the Sunday Post was up 5.1% PoP, this was the biggest increase across all three markets.

According to the latest figures, The Mail on Sunday took the biggest hit with its circulation down just over 42,000 (-2.5%).

All titles were down across the yearly period, with the Sun (Sunday) losing 314,704, followed by the Mail on Sunday (186,344).

Overall, the Sunday titles were down 0.4% PoP and 11.6% YoY, surpassing the million mark in terms of circulation loss.

The above figures have shown that overall, print circulations are declining. This in some respects is down to readers switching to digital platforms to consume their news, business and more general content.

The graph below shows the ever increasing trend of National Newspaper- daily average unique users, this is in stark contrast to how we see print circulations currently performing.

National Newspaper Daily Unique Users

However, from an advertising point of view, we feel print is vital despite circulations reducing, the medium itself is tried and tested and promotes brand affiliation. These are key elements that print media has over its digital counterpart.

National Newspaper ABC Figures – June 2013
Daily Titles Jun-12 May-13 Jun-13 YoY Actual Change YoY % Change PoP Actual Change PoP % Change
Daily Telegraph 573,674 545,579 547,106 -26,568 -4.6 1,527 0.3
Financial Times 297,225 256,655 258,488 -38,737 -13.0 1,833 0.7
Guardian 211,511 192,376 187,000 -24,511 -11.6 -5,376 -2.8
i 272,597 306,578 303,009 30,412 11.2 -3,569 -1.2
Independent 90,001 75,089 73,060 -16,941 -18.8 -2,029 -2.7
Scotsman 35,523 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Times 400,120 394,982 390,941 -9,179 -2.3 -4,041 -1.0
Daily Express 602,482 525,235 522,264 -80,218 -13.3 -2,971 -0.6
Daily Mail 1,939,635 1,787,558 1,806,569 -133,066 -6.9 19,011 1.1
Daily Mirror 1,081,330 1,041,289 1,038,753 -42,577 -3.9 -2,536 -0.2
Daily Record 279,324 255,238 252,626 -26,698 -9.6 -2,612 -1.0
Daily Star 602,296 534,813 540,849 -61,447 -10.2 6,036 1.1
Sun 2,583,552 2,269,238 2,243,903 -339,649 -13.1 -25,335 -1.1
Total Daily 8,969,270 8,184,630 8,164,568 -804,702 -9.0 -20,062 -0.2
London Free Press Jun-12 May-13 Jun-13 YoY Actual Change YoY % Change PoP Actual Change PoP % Change
City A.M 132,857 127,983 128,152 -4,705 -3.5 169 0.1
London Evening Standard 700,506 702,458 699,951 -555 -0.1 -2,507 -0.4
Metro (London) 777,396 776,012 772,824 -4,572 -0.6 -3,188 -0.4
Total London Press 1,610,759 1,606,453 1,600,927 -9,832 -0.6 -5,526 -0.3
Sunday Titles Jun-12 May-13 Jun-13 YoY Actual Change YoY % Change PoP Actual Change PoP % Change
Independent On Sunday 122,588 113,082 111,986 -10,602 -8.6 -1,096 -1.0
Observer 243,946 222,723 212,376 -31,570 -12.9 -10,347 -4.6
Scotland on Sunday. 44,041 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Sunday Times 915,969 842,810 840,201 -75,768 -8.3 -2,609 -0.3
Sunday Telegraph 450,276 420,742 422,590 -27,686 -6.1 1,848 0.4
Mail On Sunday 1,824,393 1,680,069 1,638,049 -186,344 -10.2 -42,020 -2.5
Sunday Express 512,843 462,812 455,901 -56,942 -11.1 -6,911 -1.5
Sunday Post 279,120 232,412 244,257 -34,863 -12.5 11,845 5.1
Daily Star Sunday. 473,352 329,669 335,864 -137,488 -29.0 6,195 1.9
Sunday People 450,097 415,539 415,075 -35,022 -7.8 -464 -0.1
Sun (Sunday) 2,189,924 1,867,980 1,875,220 -314,704 -14.4 7,240 0.4
Sunday Mail 313,698 288,736 284,051 -29,647 -9.5 -4,685 -1.6
Sunday Mirror 1,088,499 1,029,210 1,037,542 -50,957 -4.7 8,332 0.8
Total Sunday 8,908,746 7,905,784 7,873,112 -1,035,634 -11.6 -32,672 -0.4

Digital ad spend in the UK reaches record highs, surpassing the £5 billion mark in 2012 alone!

Research from the Internet Advertising Bureau has revealed a growth in digital advertising in the UK, with mobile accounting for 10% of all digital revenue in 2012.

Digital ad revenue reached an annual high of £5.42 billion last year, a record 12.5% year on year high, mobile advertising was responsible for approximately £526 million, revealing a growth of 148%!

With an increase in Smartphone ownership expected to reach 75% by end of year 2013, it is no surprise that mobile advertising has grown by an astonishing 1,601% up to £13million, even without EE’s 4G prevalent network which will only be made readily available to the majority of operators this autumn.

Mobile Advertising 2013


It is also expected that the majority of search clicks in 2013 will come from mobile devices, with the prediction that mobile advertising “will undoubtedly be a billion pound medium within a few years”. Mobile has reached a milestone as marketers are becoming more attuned to the ‘always connected’ nature of consumers, who expect to engage with content wherever they are. This has resulted in advertisers encouraging consumers in all industries, to invest in integrated campaigns across online and mobile. As Anna Bartz from PwC, said: “The advertising market is shifting toward storytelling and integrated campaigns which give greater prominence to video and display formats with a higher degree of interactivity with the target audience”.

With the likes of social media sites such as Facebook, and with them recently unveiling plans for a Smartphone which it claims will “make the social network the home of Android devices, as it looks to expand its mobile advertising offering”,  it is no wonder that social media has contributed to this astonishing high turnover in digital advertising. With mobile advertising increasing from £265 million to £328.4 million in 2012, meaning that in only 3 years social media revenue has quadrupled at 383%.

Last but not least, video ad revenue is responsible for 12% of all online and mobile display advertising with an overall £160 million revenue, which has helped contribute to such a high digital ad spend in 2012.

The top five display advertising sectors in 2012 are as follows; finance (15%), entertainment and media (13%), retail (12%) and technology (9%).

It Is Not All Doom and Gloom

The release of this period’s ABC results on August 16th has provided food for thought for many. The continued downward trend which has been seen almost uniformly across print platforms has fuelled conversation about the importance of digital editions and ‘multi-touchpoint’ brands.

Print ABC results from January to June 2012 have painted a fairly bleak picture for both the consumer magazine and newspaper markets, with just a few exceptions.

The Men’s Lifestyle sector continues to be dominated by the free titles Shortlist and Sport, whilst well-known, paid for titles FHM and Nuts reported substantial drops in sales of -12% and -21% respectively.

In a mirror of these results, Shortlist’s sister title, Stylist, has also enjoyed positive results this period, bucking the overall Women’s Lifestyle trend and reporting a 1.1% year-on-year increase in circulation to rank at number 15 in the Top 100 Magazines. Major titles Glamour, Hello! and Look were among the worst hit, although More reported the worst result in this sector with a fall of 30.5% in circulation.

The Home Interest market saw a mixed set of results. There were a number of increases, including Country Homes & Interiors, Living etc and Style at Home, GoodHomes and Elle Decoration. Although some titles suffered losses – among them Ideal Home, Country Living and House Beautiful.

The Domestic News and Affairs market has completely subverted the downward trend demonstrated elsewhere, with every title boasting a year-on year increase in a market that reports a 5.4% year-on-year increase.

ABC Comparisons

The Daily Newspaper market posted a decrease of 9.3%, although notable winners from this sector include i and The Daily Telegraph, who both reported an increase in sales from the previous ABCs.

However, analysts have chosen not to focus solely on the negative trends shown in these most recent ABC figures.

Rather, the decline in print has been countered by increases in the digital ABCs, with many commentators focusing on the future opportunities presented by digital editions, iPad and mobile for consumer magazines and newspaper titles.

In the world of consumer magazines, titles as diverse as Cosmo, GQ and Harper’s Bazaar have shown significant growth in the digital arena (50.3%, 15.8% and 9% respectively). Heat also presents an interesting case study, posting an overall brand reach of 2.8 million across platforms, whilst print circulation itself has fallen to only 326,677.

Whilst the increases seen in the digital sector are small by comparison with the decline in print, the growth should not be dismissed as more and more titles launch their digital editions.

As such, discussion of what these ABC figures mean for overall media trends should be couched in the knowledge that print is only one aspect of a title’s brand. Talking about media brands in terms of their multiple touchpoints with their audience, including print, online and mobile, gives a much clearer impression of their power, influence and value.

Men’s Lifestyle Magazine: Jan-Jun 2012 Year On Year Comparisons

Title Publisher Jan-Jun 11 Jan-Jun 12 Actual Change YoY % Ch Jul-Dec 11 PoP % Ch
Shortlist* Shortlist Media Ltd 523,665 529,010 5,345 1.0 526,359 0.5
Sport UTV Media Ltd 306,217 305,676 -541 -0.2 304,700 0.3
Men’s Health Hearst-Rodale 218,368 216,336 -2,032 -0.9 221,176 -2.2
FHM (For Him Magazine) Bauer Consumer Media 155,557 123,844 -31,713 -20.4 140,716 -12.0
GQ Conde Nast Publications Ltd 118,216 120,139 1,923 1.6 120,094 0.0
RWD RWD Creative Media Limited 98,300 96,652 -1,648 -1.7 96,240 0.4
Nuts* IPC Media Ltd 114,019 90,134 -23,885 -20.9 114,116 -21.0
Stuff Haymarket Consumer Media 80,130 76,083 -4,047 -5.1 80,226 -5.2
Men’s Fitness Dennis Publishing Limited 69,264 65,201 -4,063 -5.9 61,721 5.6
BBC Focus Immediate Media Company 66,454 64,625 -1,829 -2.8 67,727 -4.6
Esquire Hearst Magazines Ltd 58,218 54,702 -3,516 -6.0 56,583 -3.3
Wired Conde Nast Publications Ltd 50,150 52,136 1,986 4.0 51,056 2.1
Healthy for Men** River Publishing Ltd 60,499 47,770 -12,729 21.0 59,157 -19.2
Zoo* Bauer Consumer Media 54,318 46,310 -8,008 -14.7 54,599 -15.2
How It Works Imagine Publishing n/a 34,089 n/a n/a 30,342 12.3
Front Magazine Kane Ltd n/a 30,009 n/a n/a 34,097 -12.0
Total n/a 1,973,375 1,952,716 -20,659 -1.0 2,018,909 -3.3

Women’s Lifestyle Magazine Circulations: Jan-Jun 2012 Year On Year Comparisons


Publisher Jan-Jun 11 Jan-Jun 12 Actual Change YoY % Ch Jul-Dec 11 PoP % Ch
John Lewis Edition John Brown 474,579 480,241 5,662 1.2 484,991 -1.0
Glamour Conde Nast Publications 530,060 470,138 -59,922 11.3 466,327 0.8
Stylist Shortlist Media Ltd 426,396 431,266 4,870 1.1 429,034 0.5
Good Housekeeping Hearst Magazines Ltd 430,878 408,569 -22,309 -5.2 448,129 -8.8
Woman & Home IPC Media 370,284 353,731 -16,553 -4.5 379,896 -6.9
Cosmopolitan Hearst Magazines Ltd 386,852 353,413 -33,439 -8.6 377,580 -6.4
Hello! Hello! Ltd 413,311 352,985 -60,326 -14.6 373,226 -5.4
Yours Bauer Consumer Media 285,890 280,804 -5,086 -1.8 282,892 -0.7
Prima Hearst Magazines Ltd 280,207 264,312 -15,895 -5.7 281,636 -6.2
Marie Claire European Magazines Limited 250,785 255,021 4,236 1.7 266,881 -4.4
Look Evarn Ltd 300,161 250,071 -50,090 -16.7 280,481 -10.8
Red Hearst Magazines Ltd 231,160 226,116 -5,044 -2.2 231,180 -2.2
Candis Newhall Publications 236,075 223,584 -12,491 -5.3 224,468 -0.4
Vogue Conde Nast Publications 210,766 205,033 -5,733 -2.7 210,806 -2.7
Grazia Bauer Consumer Media 219,741 190,053 -29,688 -13.5 205,487 -7.5
Elle Hearst Magazines Ltd 197,136 189,568 -7,568 -3.8 195,020 -2.8
Easy Living Conde Nast Publications 158,038 164,019 5,981 3.8 140,123 17.1
InStyle IPC Media 175,113 163,432 -11,681 -6.7 176,002 -7.1
Company Hearst Magazines Ltd 180,162 143,269 -36,893 -20.5 188,278 -23.9
Harpers Bazaar Hearst Magazines Ltd 118,740 119,274 534 0.4 120,004 -0.6
Essentials IPC Media 126,904 119,087 -7,817 -6.2 128,906 -7.6
Harrods Magazine Harrods Ltd 104,997 109,913 4,916 4.7 120,057 -8.4
More! Bauer Consumer Media 170,033 106,065 -63,968 -37.6 152,571 -30.5
Vanity Fair Conde Nast Publications 100,560 100,692 132 0.1 102,585 -1.8
Women’s Health Hearst-Rodale n/a 100,289 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Psychologies Hearst Magazines Ltd 108,631 92,302 -16,329 -15.0 104,491 -11.7
Tatler Conde Nast Publications 87,616 87,004 -612 -0.7 88,020 -1.2
Ladies First Magazine (Wales) Hils Publications Ltd 35,771 34,795 -976 -2.7 35,470 -1.9
WM The Womans Magazine Media Wales Ltd 34,057 32,010 -2,047 -6.0 33,744 -5.1
Image Image Publications Ltd 21,045 21,624 579 2.8 21,261 1.7
RSVP RSVP Publishing Ltd 15,109 12,603 -2,506 -16.6 13,304 -5.3
Total n/a 6,681,057 6,341,283 -440,063 -5.1 6,562,850 -3.4

Home Interest Magazines: Jan-Jun 2012 Year On Year Comparisons


Publisher Jan-Jun 11 Jan-Jun 12 Actual Change YoY % Ch Jul-Dec 11 PoP % Ch
Ideal Home IPC Media 205,778 193,203 -12,575 -6.1 195,442 -1.1
Country Living Hearst Magazines UK 206,027 190,177 -15,850 -7.7 191,599 -0.7
Ikea Family Live August Media Ltd 150,000 150,000 n/a n/a 150,000 n/a
Homes & Gardens IPC Media Ltd 137,812 131,555 -6,257 -4.5 138,868 -5.3
Your Home Hubert Burda Media UK 133,018 130,012 -3,006 -2.3 131,770 -1.3
House & Garden Conde Nast Publications Ltd 127,260 126,841 -419 -0.3 127,311 -0.4
House Beautiful Hearst Magazines UK 143,106 126,497 -16,609 -11.6 132,962 -4.9
25 Beautiful Homes IPC Media Ltd 107,974 102,012 -5,962 -5.5 100,045 2.0
Country Homes & Interiors IPC Media Ltd 92,563 99,676 7,113 7.7 97,286 2.5
Living etc IPC Media Ltd 97,098 98,250 1,152 1.2 98,143 0.1
Style at Home IPC Media Ltd 52,576 80,011 27,435 52.2 71,806 11.4
GoodHomes Kelsey Publishing Ltd 73,444 78,620 5,176 7.0 76,113 3.3
Elle Decoration Hearst Magazines UK 70,323 70,655 332 0.5 70,376 0.4
World Of Interiors Conde Nast Publications Ltd 62,089 61,849 -240 -0.4 62,096 -0.4
Homes & Antiques Immediate Media Company 58,701 61,536 2,835 4.8 64,563 -4.7
Coast Hearst Magazines UK 42,628 38,657 -3,971 -9.3 40,464 -4.5
Grand Designs Media 10 Ltd 27,820 30,653 2,833 10.2 30,820 -0.5
Image Interiors & Living Image Publications Ltd n/a 16,595 n/a n/a 14,463 14.7
Homes & Interiors Scotland Peebles Media Group Ltd 10,845 10,345 -500 -4.6 10,232 1.1
Total n/a 1,799,062 1,797,144 -1,918 -0.1 1,804,359 -0.4

News & Current Affairs – Domestic: Jan-Jun 2012 Comparisons

Title Publisher Jan-Jun 11 Jan-Jun 12 Actual Change YoY % Ch Jul-Dec 11 PoP % Ch
Private Eye Pressdram Ltd 206,266 226,046 19,780 9.6 228,112 -0.9
The Week Dennis Publishing Limited 183,617 191,401 7,784 4.2 187,536 2.1
BBC History Magazine Immediate Media Company 69,394 71,403 2,009 2.9 72,271 -1.2
Spectator Spectator (1828) Ltd 62,852 63,612 760 1.2 63,543 0.1
The Oldie Oldie Publications 40,386 42,314 1,928 4.8 41,008 3.2
Limerick Post Carnbeg Ltd 34,340 36,216 1,876 5.5 35,393 2.3
Prospect Prospect Publishing Ltd 31,985 32,115 130 0.4 32,105 0.0
Total: n/a 628,840 663,107 34,267 5.4 659,968 0.5

Daily Newspaper Market – National Newspaper ABC Figures: July 2012

Daily Titles Jul-11 Jun-12 Jul-12 YoY Actual Change YoY % Change PoP Actual Change PoP % Change
Daily Telegraph 634,113 573,674 581,249 -52,864 -8.3 7,575 1.3
Financial Times 336,590 297,225 290,765 -45,825 -13.6 -6,460 -2.2
Guardian 248,775 211,511 209,354 -39,421 -15.8 -2,157 -1.0
Herald (Scotland) 47,226 44,445 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
i 183,677 272,597 280,122 96,445 52.5 7,525 2.8
Independent 182,881 90,001 83,619 -99,262 -54.3 -6,382 -7.1
Scotsman 38,987 35,523 34,127 -4,860 -12.5 -1,396 -3.9
Times 441,205 400,120 404,099 -37,106 -8.4 3,979 1.0
Mid Market
Daily Express 625,952 602,482 555,544 -70,408 -11.2 -46,938 -7.8
Daily Mail 2,050,132 1,939,635 1,921,239 -128,893 -6.3 -18,396 -0.9
Daily Mirror 1,185,729 1,081,330 1,082,054 -103,675 -8.7 724 0.1
Daily Record 305,226 279,324 275,526 -29,700 -9.7 -3,798 -1.4
Daily Star 706,757 602,296 623,534 -83,223 -11.8 21,238 3.5
Sun 2,821,618 2,583,552 2,550,859 -270,759 -9.6 -32,693 -1.3
Total Daily 9,808,868 9,013,715 8,892,091 -916,777 -9.3 -121,624 -1.3